Tuesday, November 30, 2010

VW Appoints New Chief Executive for Bentley and Bugatti

November 29, 2010, 12:57 pm

6:16 p.m. | Updated

The Volkswagen Group has appointed Wolfgang Dürheimer as head of its two ultra-luxe divisions, Bentley and Bugatti. He will replace Franz-Josef Paefgen as chairman and chief executive of Bentley, and president and chief executive of Bugatti. Mr. Paefgen will serve as a consultant to the Volkswagen Group, which owns Bentley and Bugatti.

Under Mr. Paefgen, Bentley expanded its facilities in Crewe, England, and increased its work force. The automaker released several new models, and sales rose from 6,576 units in 2004 to more than 10,000 in 2007. In 2003, Bentley won the 24 Hours of Le Mans for the first time since 1930.

At Bugatti, Mr. Paefgen was responsible for the development of the Veyron 16.4 supercar.

In a news release, Bentley said that Mr. Paefgen will reach “the normal retirement age of 65 in May.” Mr. Dürheimer, 52, will assume his new position on Feb. 1.

Mr. Dürheimer comes from Porsche, where he was the vice president of research and development. Before that, he managed the 911 product line.

“Wolfgang Dürheimer personifies the outstanding technical competency of Porsche,” said Martin Winterkorn, chief executive of Volkswagen, said in a statement. “He will bring this expertise and his experience to Bentley and Bugatti, helping them maintain their leading positions within the luxury segment.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Obama’s WikiLeaks Wake Up Call

This is a pivotal moment in the larger foreign policy debate. During Bush’s second term, realists (i.e. Baker/Hamilton) and leftists (Obama’s crew) joined forces and presented what seemed like a coherent critique of Bush foreign policy and neoconservatism. Cheney’s influence was replaced with Condi’s. The realists/leftists agreed that we needed to negotiate with Iran and Syria, leave Iraq, and focus on creating a Palestinian state. Then Obama was elected and turned this agenda into policy.

On the peace process, Obama made these ideas the basis of his approach. He got tough with Israel and made settlements the centerpiece of the conflict while refusing to ever criticize or pressure the Palestinians.

So the peace process has quickly fallen apart, and now, just as this reality is setting in — that Obama mishandled it from day one, in thrall to bad ideas — we get Wikileaks, which is quickly obliterating the Gulf-side Middle East worldview of the leftist-realists.

They said the Palestinians are the key to pleasing the Arabs — but in private, we now know that the Arabs barely ever mention Palestine. They said that the Israelis manipulate our foreign policy — but we now know that the Arabs were the ones openly calling for the U.S. to start a war with Iran. They said that America’s closeness with Israel alienates the Arabs — but we now know that what’s really alienating the Arabs is America’s reluctance to use its power to confront Iran and enforce a security architecture in which Israel is America’s most capable client.

In both halves of the Middle East — Levant and Gulf — the realist-leftists have gotten their way for the past few years. And the collapse of the peace process plus Wikileaks shows that their way is a fantasy that is scaring the daylights out of our allies and risking catastrophe.

As I see it, the meaning of Wikileaks is that we are at a moment when a bookend is being placed on a brief period of ascendancy for the realist-leftist foreign policy movement. It’s going to be a bruising downhill ride for these guys from here on out. (I hope.)

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Porsche Green Lights 'Cajun' Small S.U.V.

November 29, 2010, 4:05 pm

Porsche said Monday that its supervisory board had approved the development of a new small S.U.V. for series production. The vehicle is known as the Cajun — for now — and it will slot beneath the Cayenne S.U.V.

It is still early in the Cajun’s development, so no prices or release dates are mentioned in the Porsche news release. The vehicle was mentioned only in passing in a lengthy interview by Der Spiegel with Martin Winterkorn, chief executive of the Volkswagen Group, last month. “There will also be a new S.U.V., a little brother for the Cayenne, which might be called the Cajun,” Mr. Winterkorn said at the time. “We’ll make the Porsche brand sparkle even more.”

Last year, VW acquired effective control of Porsche, concluding a long power struggle between the companies. VW has plans to merge with Porsche in 2011, and the move is seen as a way for VW to take advantage of Porsche’s upmarket cachet while using its own production resources to expand the Porsche lineup. The Cajun is a step in that direction.

Porsche says the Cajun will be sporty, focusing on “light weight, ease of handling and agility.” It will most likely be much cheaper than the Cayenne and serve as an entry-level S.U.V. to attract younger customers, much like the Boxster’s role on the sports car side. The two companies had previously collaborated on the development of the Porsche Cayenne and VW Touareg.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Eco-Driving? The Europeans Have Some Lessons to Learn

In a recent study on the habits of European drivers, Fiat found that German drivers tend to accelerate too hard but maintain a steady speed, that British drivers have mastered manual transmissions and that Italians have a difficult time slowing down.

Hardly groundbreaking news, but the study of 5,700 drivers spanning 150 days highlights the type of information that can be obtained from Fiat’s eco:Drive software, which provides drivers with data meant to improve their driving habits.

First offered on 2009 Fiat models in Europe, eco:Drive is free from the Fiat site and can be imported to the car via a built-in U.S.B. input, said Candido Peterlini, a vice president of product innovation at the Fiat Group. Mr. Peterlini said eco:Drive had been downloaded 140,000 times.

He said the eco:Drive system records driver behavior related to acceleration and deceleration, braking, speed and gear changes. It measures that performance against eco-driving ideals, which include early gear changes, maintaining a steady speed, smooth acceleration and efficient deceleration.

Apparently, European drivers fail to reach the ideal, which Fiat said if fully realized across the European Union would save the equivalent of five times the annual production of the world’s biggest oil rig. Top eco-drivers recorded 16 percent fuel savings in the survey, but average savings using the tips was 6 percent.

American drivers will soon have the chance to be rated on eco-driving techniques because the software-based system will be available on the United States version of the Fiat 500, which will roll out in January, said Ariel Gavilan, a Fiat spokesman for North America.

British and German drivers got a “higher index,” Mr. Peterlini said, with the French, Italians and Spanish trailing. “Indeed, there is a difference in northern and southern Europe,” he said.

The Germans won the honors for best traffic system, which Mr. Peterlini defined as including such innovations as timed green lights to allow smooth flow and wide roads to deter tie-ups. In the survey, German drivers recorded an average speed of 21 miles per hour (with six minutes average stop time per day), compared to 19 miles per hour for Spain (with 10 minutes of stop time). According to Fiat, if London drivers could improve their average of 12 miles per hour to 15 miles per hour, it would save 11 percent in carbon dioxide emissions.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Wagner Takes on Steele

Former Missouri state chairman Ann Wagner officially joined the field of candidates vying to become the RNC’s chairman on Monday, and talked to FrumForum about her political experience, her support on the Committee, and the possibility of being the first female chair since 1977.

Wagner started in politics as a Lafayette Township committeewoman. But she really cut her political teeth working on redistricting in 1990, before joining the Bush-Quayle campaign and later the John Ashcroft for Senate bid.

Wagner chaired the Missouri GOP for six years, and was co-chairman of the RNC for four of those years. During her tenure, Missouri’s state house and senate were taken over by Republicans for the first time in forty years. In 2005, President George W. Bush appointed her to be Ambassador to Luxembourg.

Upon returning she decided to chair Senator-elect Roy Blunt’s campaign, starting in 2009. “I wasn’t back from Europe for more than a couple of months… and I had the feeling that socialism had followed me back home, across the pond,” she said. Blunt went on to win by fourteen percent.

Despite this, she claims that the RNC didn’t do much to help them win:

While I was chairing the campaign, the RNC that I saw wasn’t supporting the states… to the level that they needed to be. I went to D.C., and even met with Chairman Steele and others, but at the end of the day… it was really a lot of independent expenditures and other committees that are inefficient and we shouldn’t have to go through [those] going into a presidential cycle.

Her agenda, posted on her website, includes developing a mandatory code of ethics for all RNC staff, an annual audit to be made available to each members of the RNC, the replacement of the 72 hour program and the institution of new controls on expenses.

Many of the advantages that Wagner claims are also veiled criticisms of incumbent Chairman Michael Steele. ?“I’m going to be a full-time chairman, who doesn’t take outside money of any sort. I also… won’t take fees for books or outside speaking,” Wagner told FrumForum. Chairman Steele has been criticized for taking speaking fees and putting out a book while Chairman.

The RNC has never elected a woman to be chair – Mary Louise Smith was appointed by President Ford in 1974 – but this year two competitive female candidates are jockeying for position: Wagner and 2008 Republican Convention organizer Maria Cino.

“It’s certainly been well over a generation since we’ve had a woman [as RNC Chairman]… if you look at our electorate out there, women make up a majority of the electorate… I think a suburban, mother of three from a battleground state who knows how to win elections might be a great fit,” said Wagner.

It is unclear how much support Wagner has on the Committee, of which she was a member from 1999 to 2005. “I would say there is… 25-30% of the Committee that I know from before,” says Wagner. She tells FrumForum that she has reached out to all of the RNC’s 168 members by email and has made calls to about two-thirds.? “Many new faces, but I’m not shy the least bit about reaching out and talking about my plans going forward. I hope they still see me as one of them – I feel very much associated with the Republican National Committee.”

Another important question is whether Wagner has close ties or preferences for potential 2012 presidential candidates. But as U.S. Ambassador to Luxembourg from 2005 to 2009, Wagner says she was prohibited from engaging in partisan activities. “I’m a true honest broker, and can be, all across the board,” asserted Wagner. “I can be for all of them. I’m not tied to a specific presidential candidate.”

Watch for Tennessee National Committeeman John Ryder to be a crucial ally in her campaign. “John Ryder from Tennessee…was one of the first key folks to contact me and talk to me about considering going forward with a look at the chairmanship,” Wagner told FrumForum.

Wagner had been rumored to be interested in running against Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill in 2012, and kept the door open on a future bid should the RNC Chairman campaign not work out.

“I’m fully focused on being chairman of the Republican National Committee. That decision will be made on January 14th,” Wagner emphasized. “I would never close the door on an opportunity to serve my country or my state, but I am fully focused… on being the next chairman.”

Follow Tim on twitter: www.twitter.com/timkmak

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Monday, November 29, 2010

North Korea Deploys Anti-Air Missiles

Missile North Korea Deploys Anti Air Missilesabc.net.au reports:

North Korea has reportedly deployed missiles near the South Korean border as naval exercises get underway.

Naval war games are underway today off the west coast of South Korea.

The exercise includes the use of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George Washington.

North Korea has warned that such games risk pushing the peninsula to the brink of war.

According to South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency, North Korea has deployed SA-2 surface-to-air missiles near the border.

The report suggested that the missiles appear to be in place to target the South’s jets flying close to the frontier.

These Soviet-designed missiles have a range of between 8 and 30 kilometres.

Though the report is new, the missiles are said to have been in place for days.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Cables Show North Korea Armed Iran

Secret American intelligence assessments have concluded that Iran has obtained a cache of advanced missiles, based on a Russian design, that are much more powerful than anything Washington has publicly conceded that Tehran has in its arsenal, diplomatic cables show.

Iran obtained 19 of the missiles from North Korea, according to a cable dated Feb. 24 of this year. The cable is a detailed, highly classified account of a meeting between top Russian officials and an American delegation led by Vann H. Van Diepen, an official with the State Department’s nonproliferation division who, as a national intelligence officer several years ago, played a crucial role in the 2007 assessment of Iran’s nuclear capacity.

The missiles could for the first time give Iran the capacity to strike at capitals in Western Europe or easily reach Moscow, and American officials warned that their advanced propulsion could speed Iran’s development of intercontinental ballistic missiles.

There has been scattered but persistent speculation on the topic since 2006, when fragmentary reports surfaced that North Korea might have sold Iran missiles based on a Russian design called the R-27, once used aboard Soviet submarines to carry nuclear warheads. In the unclassified world, many arms control experts concluded that isolated components made their way to Iran, but there has been little support for the idea that complete missiles, with their huge thrusters, had been secretly shipped.

The Feb. 24 cable, which is among those obtained by WikiLeaks and made available to a number of news organizations, makes it clear that American intelligence agencies believe that the complete shipment indeed took place, and that Iran is taking pains to master the technology in an attempt to build a new generation of missiles. The missile intelligence also suggests far deeper military — and perhaps nuclear — cooperation between North Korea and Iran than was previously known. At the request of the Obama administration, The New York Times has agreed not to publish the text of the cable.

The North Korean version of the advanced missile, known as the BM-25, could carry a nuclear warhead. Many experts say that Iran remains some distance from obtaining a nuclear warhead, especially one small enough to fit atop a missile, though they believe that it has worked hard to do so.

Still, the BM-25 would be a significant step up for Iran.

Today, the maximum range of Iran’s known ballistic missiles is roughly 1,200 miles, according to experts. That means they could reach targets throughout the Middle East, including Israel, as well as all of Turkey and parts of Eastern Europe.

The range of the Russian R-27, launched from a submarine, was said to be up to 1,500 miles.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Let Them Eat Twinkies

It’s bad enough that President Obama is nationalizing our health care – that he’s leading the economy to socialist ruin – and generally seeking vengeance against the white man on behalf of his African ancestors.

But now his bossy wife and her government minions want to tell you what to eat. Just like your mother when she said you couldn’t have dessert until you’d finished your peas.? Except more sinister.? Way more sinister.

This is the latest paranoid fantasy being hatched by my compadres on the right: that, in an effort to fight rising and dangerous levels of obesity amongst Americans, Big Mother is going to come into your homes, snatch that breakfast soda out of your pudgy hands, and force feed you a fresh carrot from the White House garden.

Rush Limbaugh warned his listeners on Nov. 9:

Anyway, Michelle Obama’s on this big obesity kick, right?? Gotta eat healthy stuff, gotta eat the garbage that she grows in the garden, nothing but fruits and vegetables…Michelle Obama wants to spend $400 million to combat food deserts.? She’s all upset that the only food available to poor urban people are convenience stores, the 7-Elevens.? What did Biden say, you can’t go in one without finding an Indian?? Yeah, that’s what Joe Bite Me said.? So she’s complaining about food deserts, and Michelle Obama wants to punish Big Food and Big Retail for not putting quality food stores in poor neighborhoods, right?? And that’s why there’s an obesity epidemic, right?

And Big Mother ain’t stopping there. She’s going after your children, too.? She wants to undermine your parental authority and tell them what to eat:? no more greasy pizza slices, deep-fried processed chicken parts, transfat-injected “cake” substances, and high-fructose soft drinks in their school cafeterias.

Sarah Palin recently boasted on her Twitter feed that she would defy a supposed Pennsylvania state cookie ban:

“I’ll intro kids 2 beauty of laissez-faire via serving them cookies amidst school cookie ban debate;Nanny state run amok!”

That tweet publicized a Palin speech at Plumstead Christian Academy on Nov. 9. “I look at Pennsylvania and I think of sweets – I think of Hershey. Then I think, how dare they ban sweets from school here.”

In a surprising departure from her reputation for strictest truth, Palin mischaracterized Pennsylvania’s proposed nutrition guidelines. Sweets are not banned from Pennsylvania public schools. The state’s department of education will however recommend that schools consolidate in-class birthday parties to one per month – and that parents sponsoring the parties be asked to ensure that healthier eating options are made available to children.

What’s also surprising is that Palin described her cookie giveaway as an introduction to laissez-faire. Palin did not charge for her cookies. (To be precise: she did not charge an additional price, above her reputed $75,000 speaking fee.) Handouts are okay, so long as they come from Mama Grizzly.

Interviewed on Laura Ingraham’s radio program before Thanksgiving, Palin expanded on her thesis that junk food = freedom:

Take her [Michelle Obama’s] anti-obesity thing that she is on. She is on this kick, right. What she is telling us is she cannot trust parents to make decisions for their own children, for their own families in what we should eat. And I know I’m going to be again criticized for bringing this up, but instead of a government thinking that they need to take over and make decisions for us according to some politician or politician’s wife priorities, just leave us alone, get off our back, and allow us as individuals to exercise our own God-given rights to make our own decisions and then our country gets back on the right track.

Currently, more than 72 million American adults face serious medical consequences because of their weight.?Nearly 17% of children aged 2-19 face the same risks because they are clinically obese.?Obesity and overweight are most likely to afflict the poor and racial minorities.

Palin might not have noticed much adolescent obesity during visit to Plumstead Academy. Plumstead is located in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, the nation’s 76th wealthiest county, and 90% white. Besides, her visit occurred after school hours, at 7:30 in the evening.

But the spiraling obesity rates Palin mocks are increasingly having an impact on health care costs, which in turn affects the way we must approach and debate reforms to the healthcare system.? Those least able to afford health care disproportionately need it in large part because of the unhealthy food they eat – and that is served to their children in government-run schools. We’ve arrived at a point where inner-city children can’t identify common fresh vegetables and fruits,such as cauliflower, tomatoes, and potatoes.

Perhaps you regard it as an intolerable violation of personal liberty for government to campaign for nutritional awareness? What then do we call the federal agricultural subsidies that have helped to lower the price of super-abundant junk food? Can you explain why it’s okay for government to campaign against smoking and in favor of seatbelts? Or do you also oppose those life-saving public safety campaigns? Or is it perhaps that you have decided that everything the Obamas do is so intrinsically wrong that criticism of the Twinkie now makes you un-American?

That last sentence seems to describe Rush Limbaugh’s point of view. Rush recently argued to his listeners that Americans should? be eating more Twinkies and exercising less.

What have I told you about diet and exercise?? Exercise is irrelevant.? What matters in losing weight is what you eat, pure and simple, and how much, nothing more than that.? And everybody tries to tell me I’m wrong, that I don’t know what I’m talking about.? And every time a story comes out on this I am validated, and nobody has ever said, “Rush, you know, you were right about this.”? This is CNN, their Web page:? “For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets [Twinkies] every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too.” This is a nutrition professor.? “His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most — not the nutritional value of the food.”

Never mind that Limbaugh inaccurately describes Haub’s study (Haub ate fresh fruit and vegetables along with the sugary cakelets).? The headline conclusion Limbaugh draws from Haub’s work may well be, and most probably is, correct. A steady reduction in daily calorie intake results in a steady reduction of weight.?Cocaine-taking, chain-smoking models also famously keep the pounds off. Perhaps Limbaugh’s next monologue could promote a cigarettes-and-cocaine diet?

Here we come to the heart of the destructive craziness of what begs to be called, Junk Food Conservatism. Palin, Limbaugh and the others may? sincerely believe that “Big Government” is taking advantage of the increase in child and adult diabetes, heart disease and all-manners of obese-related illnesses to trample on our God-given freedom to guzzle soda and eat candy. But in the end, here’s the political message they are sending from their own wealthy, option-filled, Subzero-equipped enclaves to this country’s poorest:

Let them eat Twinkies.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Sunday, November 28, 2010

2006 Honda CR-V in Inquiry on Possible Fire Hazard

November 26, 2010, 2:08 pm

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an investigation into a possible fire hazard on 150,000 Honda CR-Vs from the 2006 model year.

In a recent filing, the agency said it opened the investigation after three owners complained of fires involving the master power window switch in the driver’s door.

In January, Honda recalled about 141,000 Fits from the 2007-08 model years for a fire hazard involving the master power switch in the driver’s door.

If the agency finds reason for concern, the investigation could be intensified, possibly leading to a recall. Or the investigation could be closed without any action.

Here are some other safety-related actions this week:

  • Volvo is recalling about 6,000 of its 2011 models because the engine may stall. The models are the S80, S60, XC70 and XC60. Volvo told the agency: “The engine and transmission software calibration is too sensitive. When the driver is braking during city driving, and/or releases the accelerator pedal, the engine idle speed may drop, resulting in a sudden engine stall without any prior warning.”
  • Jaguar is recalling almost 6,500 of its 2010 and 2011 XJ sedans because the windshield wipers could, in essence, fight each other to their mutual demise. The automaker told the safety agency a securing nut could loosen, resulting in the “loss of wiper arm synchronization which can cause a clash of the wiper arms” resulting in them coming off the vehicle.
  • Almost 152,000 refrigerators designed for use by a variety of recreational vehicle manufacturers are being recalled because of a fire hazard. The manufacturer, Norcold Inc. of Sidney, Ohio, said there was a problem with a thermal switch, which may fail to cut off power if “high temperatures are detected.” The units are used by manufacturers including Winnebago.
  • General Motors is recalling almost 193,000 pickups because the top tether needed to anchor a child restraint in the front center seat position is not accessible, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The vehicles are the 2004–11 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon as well as the 2006 Isuzu I-280 and I-350 and the 2007–8 Isuzu I-290 and I-370. The models are regular cabs or extended cabs that lack rear seats.

The agency said it discourages transporting children in the front seat, but since there is no rear seat the tether must be available to install a child restraint safely.

  • N.H.T.S.A. has begun an investigation into about 41,000 Kia Optimas after receiving complaints that the automatic transmission cable may come loose. It was prompted by three complaints that the transmission could not be shifted, including one who said the vehicle rolled away. The agency noted that in 2007 Kia had warned dealers of such a problem.

If the agency finds reason for concern the preliminary evaluation could be intensified, possibly leading to a recall. Or it could be closed without any action.

For more information or to report a safety problem go to http://safercar.gov/Vehicle+Owners/

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Iran Foils Hijack Attempt

iran hijack Iran Foils Hijack AttemptReuters reports:

A man linked to “anti-revolutionary” groups failed on Saturday in his attempt to hijack an Iran Air passenger plane en route to Syria and was arrested by security forces on board, news agencies said.

“A man, linked to anti-revolutionary groups, tried to create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation on board the flight … to hijack the plane,” Abbas Mosayebi from Iran Air, the national carrier, told the ISNA student news agency.

Earlier, an official from Iran Air, told the semi-official Fars news agency that the man suffered from a “mental problem”.

The Airbus plane, which had taken off from Tehran, later landed safely in Damascus, ISNA said, adding that “the suspect was arrested by the security forces on board.”

“The plane later landed safely in (the Syrian capital) Damascus … The plane is flying back to Tehran,” it reported. It said no explosives were found on board.

Click here to read more.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Hitchens vs. Blair: Is Faith a Force for Good?

It was billed as an evening with debating titans – former British PM Tony Blair and contrarian intellectual Christopher Hitchens.

To a sellout audience at Roy Thomson Hall Friday (scalpers were allegedly getting $500 for $80 tickets, which sponsor Peter Munk called “insane”), the?topic was “Be it resolved, religion is a force for good in the world.”

The audience registered pre-debate views (22% agreed, 57% didn’t and 75% said nothing would change their view), and then they voted again after the 90-minute session – which Hitchens’ atheism clearly won by gaining 17% more support to Blair’s increase of 7%.

Blair, a convert to Roman Catholicism, was at something of a disadvantage, defending? religious faith against arguably the world’s best known atheist whose courage, verve and candor in dealing with his own terminal cancer of the esophagus has won the respect of even avowed enemies.

In fact, while Hitchens looked frail and wane, his voice was powerful and resonant and he clearly had the audience mesmerized with wit, irreverence, good humor and passion.

Author of books deflating the myth of Mother Theresa, and God is Not Great plus a memoir (Hitch-22) that tells more about him than many of us want to know, Hitchens rejected the idea of? God as a?“celestial divinity” that is judge, jury and enforcer of humans who are a product of creation rather than evolution, and who inflict horrible reprisals on one another.

Blair argued that while extremists did terrible things, religion was a source of good and “inspiration” to many who worked for the betterment of people. Regardless of differences in religious belief, moderation was a force for good in the world – especially in Africa today.

While Hitchens had the audience of 2,700 captivated, he wandered into strange ground when he praised goals of communism that sought to make the world better without formal religion. He praised Canada’s Dr. Norman Bethune, who devised a method of battlefield blood transfusions while with communist forces in the 1937 Spanish Civil War.

Hitchens failed to mention Bethune being a hero in China where he was a doctor with Mao Zedong’s army and treated only communists and ignored others.

Where both Hitchens and Blair seemed to agree, was that too much faith can blind reason and lead to extremism and be lethal. That also applies to too little faith (the Soviet Union, China, North Korea).

Blair and Hitchens clearly respect and like each other.

While Blair seems to have shed years and looks younger since giving up the job as Britain’s PM and leader of?the Labour Party, Hitchens has aged and by the end of the evening looked exhausted and drawn.

An embarrassment to him, has been how religious opponents have declared they are praying for his well-being. He has said he appreciates their concern, but wishes they would stop. He is a man reconciled to his fate, who neither complains nor whines, and whose loss, when it comes, will be felt more deeply than even he could imagine.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Obama: I Read Bible and Pray Every Day

obama praying2 Obama: I Read Bible and Pray Every DayThe Hill reports:

Praying and reading the Bible are part of his everyday life, President Obama said in a wide-ranging interview broadcast Friday.

Speaking with Barbara Walters, Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama also described how they involve their daughters in daily prayer.

“Michelle and I have not only benefited from our prayer life, but I think the girls have too,” the president told Walters. “We say grace before we eat dinner every night. We take turns.”

“[I]n the end, we always say we hope we live long and strong,” the first lady said.

“Long and strong. And that we give back.”

Obama has been dogged by criticism about his faith since he took office. A poll released in late August showed that a growing number of Americans — one in five, up from one in ten in March — say he is a Muslim.

When asked if he prays himself, the president said: “I do. Every night.”

He also says that he reads the Bible, and, asked to explain why so many Americans deny that he is a Christian, blamed the internet.

“Well, you know, the Internet has a powerful effect these days, and so, the way rumors can take on a life of their own ends up being very powerful,” he said.

Click here to read more.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Friday, November 26, 2010

Hitchens to Debate Tony Blair

Christopher Hitchens Hitchens to Debate Tony BlairBBC reports:

Former UK prime minister Tony Blair is to take on columnist Christopher Hitchens in a televised public debate for and against religion.

Mr Blair, a Catholic convert, will argue that faith is a force for good.

Mr Hitchens, terminally ill with cancer, is expected to argue it is the world’s “main source of hatred”, as he did in his 2007 book God is not Great.

A 23-country poll paid for by the debate’s Canadian organisers suggests the world is evenly split on the issue.

Some 48% of the 18,192 people questioned by Ipsos took the view that “religion provides the common values and ethical foundations that diverse societies need to the thrive in the 21st Century”.

Fractionally more – 52% – supported the view that “religious beliefs promote intolerance, exacerbate ethnic divisions, and impede social progress in developing and developed nations alike”.

Rich countries were less likely to see religion as a force for good than poor countries – the main exception being the United States, where 65% said it had a positive impact.

Ahead of the debate, which will take place in front of a sell-out audience of 2,700 people in Toronto’s Roy Thomson Hall, Tony Blair said: “The good that people of faith all over the world do every day, motivated by their religion, cannot be underestimated and should never be ignored.”

It could, and should, be a force for progress, he said.

Christopher Hitchens – who has described Christianity, Judaism and Islam as the “real axis of evil” – has continued his outspoken attacks on religion in interviews as he is treated for cancer of the oesophagus.

He is scathing about those who suggest his illness might lead him to retract his atheism.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Krauthammer: START Treaty is Irrelevant

charles krauthammer Krauthammer: START Treaty is IrrelevantThe Washington Post reports:

It’s a lame-duck session. Time is running out. Unemployment is high, the economy is dangerously weak and, with five weeks to go, no one knows what tax anyone will be paying on everything from income to dividends to death when the current rates expire Jan. 1. And what is the?president demanding that Congress pass as “a top priority”? To what did he devote his latest?weekly radio address? Ratification of his New START treaty.

Good grief. Even among national security concerns, New START is way down at the bottom of the list. From the naval treaties of the 1920s to this day, arms control has oscillated between mere symbolism at its best to major harm at its worst, with general uselessness being the norm.

The reason is obvious. The problem is never the weapon; it is the nature of the regime controlling the weapon. That’s why no one stays up nights worrying about British nukes, while everyone worries about Iranian nukes.

In Soviet days, arms control at least could be justified as giving us something to talk about when there was nothing else to talk about, symbolically relieving tensions between mortal enemies. It could be argued that it at least had a soporific and therapeutic effect in the age of “the balance of terror.”

But in post-Soviet days? The Russians are no longer an existential threat. A nuclear exchange between Washington and Moscow is inconceivable. What difference does it make how many nukes Russia builds? If they want to spend themselves into penury creating a bloated nuclear arsenal, be our guest.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

York: Polls Point to Obama Defeat in 2012

We’re fast approaching the halfway point in Barack Obama’s term. With Nov. 2 behind him, everything the president does will be calculated to boost, or at least not harm, his chances of re-election in 2012. What’s not clear is whether he fully appreciates how badly the coalition he led to victory in 2008 has frayed in just two years. A look inside his poll numbers suggests that if he cannot turn around some key trends, he’ll be a one-term president.

Just look at the exit polls from 2008, which reveal the demographic contours of Obama’s support. Compare those with Gallup’s weekly analysis of the president’s approval rating, drawn from multiple polls broken down by age, gender, political philosophy, and the like. Throw in some insights from the midterm elections, and the mix shows a dramatic deterioration in Obama’s 2008 support. “His majority coalition is not there,” says Republican pollster David Winston. “What he put together, at least in the way he put it together, just isn’t there.”

Start with voters who call themselves independents. Obama won 52 percent of them in 2008; now, according to Gallup, he is at 42 percent. Obama’s party as a whole fared even worse among independents in the midterms, losing them to Republicans by 19 points. If Obama does anywhere near that badly in 2012, he’ll lose.

Next, women. In 2008, Obama won 56 percent of female voters. Today, he’s at 49 percent. If that number doesn’t improve, he’ll be in deep trouble. (Obama is also down with men, from 49 percent in 2008 to 44 percent now.)

Even younger voters, a key part of Obama’s coalition, are peeling away. In ‘08, Obama won 66 percent of voters 18-29 years of age. Now, he’s at 58 percent. That might seem pretty good, but not when you consider his deterioration among other age groups. Obama has dropped 5 percentage points among voters in and around middle age, and 8 percent with voters above 65. If those trends continue, he’ll lose.

Then there are white voters. In ‘08, Obama won 43 percent of whites. Now, he’s at 37 percent — a dangerously low number for his re-election hopes. He won 67 percent of Hispanic voters in 2008; now, he’s at 58 percent. Even support among black voters, a bedrock for Obama, has ticked downward; after winning 95 percent of blacks in ‘08, he’s now at 89 percent.

Just one group has stuck with Obama through it all. In ‘08, he won 58 percent of people with graduate degrees. Now, he’s at 59 percent. It appears that academic types will be with Obama always, but they’re not enough.

Everyone expects some of Obama’s lost voters to come back in 2012. “Presidential elections are different from midterms,” says David Winston. “You’ll see a slightly larger turnout among younger voters, a slightly larger turnout among African-Americans, making the electorate a little more liberal. But everybody across the board turns out at higher rates.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Thursday, November 25, 2010

The Case of the Nissan Leaf's Unexpected Sticker

Two federal agencies say they know how far the new Nissan Leaf will go on a fully charged battery. They just don’t agree.

A few weeks before the Nissan Leaf is delivered to buyers, the Environmental Protection Agency, which approves the fuel economy stickers that go in the window of every new car, says it will go 73 miles. The Federal Trade Commission says the correct number is 96 to 110. (These range numbers, it’s worth pointing out, are distinct from the fuel economy numbers that Nick Bunkley recently wrote about in The New York Times.)

The Federal Trade Commission is no stranger to stickers; it approves the ones for refrigerators and dishwashers and is working on a new one for television sets, highlighting the difference between plasma and LED. Under the 1985 Energy Policy and Conservation Act, it is supposed to label all alternative-fuel vehicles, including the all-electric Leaf.

But the E.P.A. does its own testing, in laboratories built primarily to measure tailpipe pollution. It uses both the pollution test cycle, called the Federal Test Procedure, and other tests that simulate different weather conditions and driving routes. (Using the heater or air-conditioner, for example, will reduce range.)

The Federal Trade Commission does not do its own tests; it relies on a standard set by the S.A.E., a technical group formerly known as the Society of Automotive Engineers. Automakers report their results to the commission. The commission is not terribly concerned over not being able to check for itself, according to the associate director for enforcement, James A. Kohm. Manufacturers like Nissan, for the Leaf, or General Motors, for the plug-in hybrid Volt, he said, “are big legitimate companies that are generally trying to do these right.” And besides, he added, “they have competitors looking over their shoulders.”

The perils of cheating on energy efficiency were demonstrated by LG, the South Korean conglomerate, which was caught in 2008 misstating the efficiency of some of its refrigerators. These were tested by competitors and by Consumer Reports magazine.

But Mr. Kohm said that the commission had “a long history of ensuring that the commission doesn’t engage in confusing and conflicting advice.”

Policy is set by the five commissioners, who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The commission recently proposed new rules under which it would defer to the Agriculture Department in another area, whether foods could be labeled as sustainable, natural or organic.

In the meantime, Nissan has taken refundable deposits on the first 20,000 Leafs, no matter what the sticker says.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Toyota iQ to Have Electric Variant in 2012

Toyota’s urban electric car, shown in various guises at auto shows, will be based on the diminutive iQ when it arrives in Europe, Japan and the United States in 2012, the company says. Journalists in Japan drove prototypes of the car recently at Mega Web, a showroom with a small test track run by the Toyota Motor Corporation in Tokyo.

The iQ will be sold as a Scion in the United States when it goes on sale early next year, but Toyota did not say whether the electric car would also wear the Scion badge.

“We’re not sure yet how many will go to which markets, and not sure how it will be marketed,” said John Hanson, a Toyota spokesman. “But it will arrive in 2012, at the same time as the electric RAV4 and the plug-in hybrid Prius.”

A series of “road trials” of the electric iQ will begin in the three introductory markets next year, and sales in China are also under consideration.

Mr. Hanson said Toyota would have a “wide variety of programs” to help it meet coming environmental regulations. Between 2012 and 2015, it will introduce not only the electric iQ, but also a much-publicized plug-in hybrid and a fuel-cell car. The company will also bring out 11 new or redesigned hybrid models by the end of 2012. The electric RAV4, developed with Tesla Motors, was unveiled at the Los Angeles auto show last week.

Toyota also said Thursday that it was continuing development of its fuel-cell sedan, which Mr. Hanson said would go on sale “in 2015 or earlier.” The company said “a price under 10 million yen seems attainable,” which set off some alarm bells because that translates into more than $120,000.

But Mr. Hanson said the company planned to sharply cut production costs for its fuel-cell car by the time it reaches the market.

“We obviously have to reduce costs further, and that will be done in a lot of different ways,” he said. “We’re talking about a vehicle we want to sell in volume, so it can’t have an exotic-car price. The figure the company cited is simply where we are right now, but remember we used to call fuel-cell cars ‘million-dollar’ vehicles.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

DeLay Found Guilty

Tom DeLay, the former Republican congressional leader known as “The Hammer” for his brass-knuckles style, was convicted Wednesday of criminally crossing the line into dirty politics.

A Texas jury found DeLay guilty of one charge of laundering corporate money into political donations and one charge of conspiracy. He could face a lengthy prison term for the conviction.

The former House majority leader vowed to appeal the ruling and said he hoped he would be able to get his case heard by “people that understand the law.”

“This is an abuse of power, and it is a miscarriage of justice,” he told reporters.

“I still maintain that I am innocent, that the criminalization of politics undermines our very system, and I’m very disappointed in the outcome.”

Prosecutors argued that DeLay, once among the most powerful Republicans in the US Congress, schemed to influence the Texas elections in 2002 to tighten his grip on his leadership post.

The defense painted DeLay as a hands-off manager who did not know what his associates were doing and argued that no laws were broken.

At the heart of the case was one transaction: DeLay’s political committee in Texas sent 190,000 dollars of corporate donations to the Republican National Committee, which in turn donated the same amount to seven Texas candidates supported by DeLay in the 2002 mid-term election.

Texas law prohibits corporate giving to candidates.

The pivotal contest became the first step in DeLay’s plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts and tighten his grip on the leadership post by enlarging the Republican majority in Congress.

By 2004 DeLay had accomplished all of that, but a year later a Texas grand jury handed up the felony indictments on charges of money laundering and conspiracy and DeLay was forced to resign as House majority leader.

He retired from Congress, after 22 years, in the middle of his re-election bid in 2006.

DeLay declined to take the stand in his defense, but the case still turned on his words.

DeLay made a last-minute bid to save his political career by meeting with prosecutors in 2005 and the taped interview provided the most dramatic moment of the trial.

DeLay told prosecutors that he knew that Jim Ellis, DeLay’s chief political aide in Washington, was going to exchange 190,000 dollars of corporate money for campaign donations from the Republican National Committee.

“Jim Ellis told me he was going to do it,” DeLay said. “Before he did it?” prosecutors asked. “Uh-huh,” DeLay answered.

But DeLay also told prosecutors that he made no decisions about the money swap, assumed it was legal, did not talk to RNC officials about it and knew few details.

DeLay said he knew only that Ellis “was going to take 190,000 dollars and take it to the RNC and exchange it for hard money.”

DeLay said when Ellis told him about it, he just said, “Fine.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Ireland Unveils Budget Cut Plan

Ireland’s fractured coalition government Wednesday outlined an ambitious four-year plan of EUR15 billion in spending reductions and tax measures, but vowed to keep its 12.5% corporation tax rate.

“Today is about Ireland putting its best foot forward–Ireland saying yes, here’s what we’re prepared to do, as a government and as a people, to put to right the issues that have to be put to right to give ourselves prospects and prosperity again,” Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen told reporters.

The government said there will be EUR10 billion of spending cuts and EUR5 billion in tax measures between now and 2014, with 40% of those cuts coming in next year’s budget.

Among the key measures are cuts to welfare, the minimum wage and public-sector staff numbers, pay and pensions. On the tax side, the government proposes an increase in value-added tax to 23% from 21% by 2014, cuts to pension relief and a new tax to fund local public services, as well as a shakeup of the income-tax system to bring in more low earners.

Underpinning the plan is the government’s expectation that the Irish economy will grow by 2.75% annually in the next four years.

Juergen Michels, an economist at Citi, said this growth forecast is probably too optimistic.

“We suspect that Ireland will probably still fail to meet its fiscal targets by 2014,” he said in a note.

The four-year plan also aspires to broaden Ireland’s base of lenders to include more domestic pension funds and individual savers–85% of its bonds are held by overseas investors.

“Faced with a buyers’ strike, a further spike in yields and potentially an outflow from bank deposits, this is arguably not something that one would really want to draw attention to,” said David Owen, chief European financial economist at Jefferies.

Although Ireland’s Fianna Fail-led coalition will almost certainly lose a general election due early next year, it must commit to this four-year plan to pave the way for a multibillion-euro bailout from the European Union and International Monetary Fund, and must pass a 2011 budget that is front-loaded with EUR6 billion of those cuts.

The plan aims to cut Ireland’s budget deficit to 3% of gross domestic product by 2014–and to 9.1% of GDP in 2011–from 32% of GDP in 2010, stabilize the fragile banking sector and allow the government to regain control of its public finances, but crucially it doesn’t require a parliamentary vote.

“The reality from this country is that we have to control the spiraling debt and reduce it. We have brought it under control; we are now taking a decisive step in reducing that debt and bringing it down to single-digit figures,” said Finance Minister Brian Lenihan.

The biggest challenge for this short-lived government still lies ahead: Lenihan will announce his 2011 budget on Dec. 7, which he has said must be passed in order for Ireland to receive an aid package currently being negotiated with the EU and IMF.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

New York Has Worst Traffic in North America, Report Says

4:56 p.m. | Updated

This Thanksgiving weekend, more than 40 million people will drive more than 50 miles from their homes, according to AAA. That’s bad news for New Yorkers, according to Navteq, a map and traffic provider, which recently released its list of most congested cities in North America. Not only did New York City top the list, but it also ranked No. 1 for the worst rush-hour roads, with the northbound lanes of the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel coming in first, followed by the eastbound George Washington Bridge.

The city in second with the worst rush hours is Washington, which apparently experiences more than one kind of gridlock, followed by San Francisco and then Seattle. Los Angelenos may be surprised to find their city ranked only No. 5 on the slowest rush-hour list.

The list was compiled based on data collected by Navteq that included live traffic reports (so-called probe data) from cellphones and portable navigation devices, as well as historical data for the year, according to Mike Finn, the company’s vice president for North American traffic. Navteq also collects traffic information from about 45 municipal government agencies, from its Traffic.com division’s road monitoring systems, commercial fleet operators and 26 company offices around the country that track incident reports.

“For live traffic, there’s been enormous growth in GPS-enabled smartphones,” Mr. Finn said, adding that these devices are helping to increase the accuracy of live traffic information.

Such additional data may also have helped give Canadians drivers their due. Montreal’s eastbound Autoroute 15 ranked third among North American’s slowest highways. Montreal also took the fifth spot with a stretch of Route 138. Not to be left out, Toronto, whose residents have complained for years to this reporter about traffic problems there, managed to just make in to the No. 10 spot of slowest rush-hour roadways with the dreaded Don Valley Parkway (northbound).

“I’ve had the thrill of being on it in the rain, and I’m not surprised to see it on the list,” Mr. Finn said.

The Navteq list compares with a report last year from Inrix, a traffic information provider, that ranked Los Angeles the most congested city, followed by New York. Although the 2009 Inrix report used some similar sources of data, it still ranked a number of New York City roads in the top 10 for the worst traffic.

Worst Rush Hours in the United States

1. New York City
2. Washington
3. San Francisco
4. Seattle
5. Los Angeles
6. Philadelphia
7. Chicago
8. Dallas-Fort Worth
9. Atlanta
10. Houston

Freeways With the Slowest Typical Rush Hour

1. New York City – Brooklyn Battery Tunnel (northbound)
2. New York City – George Washington Bridge (eastbound)
3. Montreal – Autoroute 15 (eastbound)
4. Philadelphia – U.S. 202 (southbound)
5. Montreal – Route 138 (westbound)
6. New York City – George Washington Bridge (westbound)
7. Los Angeles – I-10 (eastbound)
8. Boston – U.S. 1 (northbound)
9. Dallas – Texas State Highway Spur 366 (eastbound)
10. Toronto – Don Valley Parkway (northbound)

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Palin Rips FLOTUS’ Anti-Obesity Drive

michelle obama Palin Rips FLOTUS Anti Obesity DriveSam Stein at Huffington Post reports:

An appearance by Sarah Palin on Laura Ingraham’s radio show Wednesday morning drew a bit of pre-Thanksgiving buzz for a swipe she took at Barbara Bush for suggesting that the 2008 vice president nominee would be best served in 2012 by staying in Alaska.

“I don’t think the majority of Americans want to put up with the blue-bloods — and I want to say it will all due respect because I love the Bushes — the blue bloods who want to pick and choose their winners instead of allowing competition,” said the former Alaska Governor.

But it was another swipe at another first lady that stood out in a notably charged interview. For the second time this week, Palin threw jabs at Michelle Obama (the first instance came with the publication of Palin’s book), this time calling her campaign to improve child nutrition another instance of a philosophical devotion to big government.

I think she has got a different worldview and she is not hesitant at all to share what her worldview is. And I will take heat again for saying it on your show Laura but she encapsulated what her view of America is, I believe, unless she has evolved and things have changed in the last two years, but she said it on the campaign trail twice that it was the first time that she had been proud of her country when finally people were paying attention to Barack Obama. I think that’s appalling. We can think of this infinite number of reasons to be proud of American exceptionalism and it baffles me that anybody would have that view and then allow that view to bleed over into policy.

Take her anti-obesity thing that she is on. She is on this kick, right. What she is telling us is she cannot trust parents to make decisions for their own children, for their own families in what we should eat. And I know I’m going to be again criticized for bringing this up, but instead of a government thinking that they need to take over and make decisions for us according to some politician or politician’s wife priorities, just leave us alone, get off our back, and allow us as individuals to exercise our own God-given rights to make our own decisions and then our country gets back on the right track.

Click here to read more.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

N.H.T.S.A. Opens Audit of Rental Car Repairs

November 23, 2010, 5:14 pm

Citing troubling reports of injuries and deaths in rental cars, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has begun investigating whether millions of rental cars are being fixed when they are recalled for safety problems.

The agency opened the investigation — called an audit query — last week “to investigate recall-remedy completion by rental car companies.”

This is the first such audit this year by the safety agency. In 2009, it opened only two audits.

Clarence Ditlow, the executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, accused the rental companies of waiting “until it’s convenient to do safety recall repairs.”

But Sharon Faulkner, the executive director of the American Car Rental Association, said she was not aware of any company that did not park vehicles that were recalled until they could be repaired. “You are not in the business to hurt anyone,” she said.

As part of its investigation, N.H.T.S.A. asked Chrysler, Ford and General Motors to provide information on recalls affecting almost three million vehicles that are favored by rental companies. Several dozen models were listed, including Chevrolet Malibus, Ford Fusions and Chrysler Sebrings. As part of the request, the agency asked the automakers to report how long it took for the safety recalls to be carried out.

The action came several months after two consumer groups petitioned the Federal Trade Commission, asking it to order Enterprise Rent-A-Car to start fixing recalled vehicles before renting them. This year, Enterprise admitted in a California court that its failure to fix a Chrysler PT Cruiser was responsible for the deaths of two California women when it caught fire and crashed.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Huckabee: Obamas Should Experience Pat Down

huckabee Huckabee: Obamas Should Experience Pat DownNational Journal reports:

The first family should publicly submit to the new scanning device and “enhanced” pat-downs before requiring Americans to do the same, suggested rumored Republican presidential hopeful and ex-Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee while blasting President Obama this morning over controversial new airline security measures.

“If he thinks this is an appropriate way for us to deal with security as he has defended, then I’ve said, ‘OK, Mr. Obama, take your wife, your two daughters and your mother-in-law to Washington Reagan National Airport?and have them publicly go through both the body scanner and the full enhanced pat-down in front of others,’” Huckabee said in an interview on Fox and Friends. “‘If it’s OK for your wife, your daughters, and your mother-in-law, then maybe the rest of us won’t feel so bad when our wives, our daughters and our mothers are being put through this humiliating and degrading, totally unconstitutional, intrusion of their privacy.’”

Huckabee instead suggested TSA officials adopt “profiling” as a less costly and intrusive alternative.

The one-time Arkansas governor also said he believed that financial motives were at the heart of the new procedures: “This is more about people making millions and millions of dollars off the machines that they manufactured and then lobbied to sell to the government,” he said.

The White House has had to contend with a media furor over the new Transportation Security Administration measures in recent days. Some Republicans like Huckabee have seized on the issue as evidence of government overreach, while White House and Homeland Security officials have pushed back, saying the measures help prevent terrorism.

“I understand people’s frustrations,” Obama said at a press conference in Lisbon this weekend. “But at this point, TSA, in consultation with our counterterrorism experts, have indicated to me that the procedures that they’ve been putting in place are the only ones right now that they consider to be effective against the kind of threat that we saw in the Christmas Day bombing.”

Obama noted in his response to a question about the TSA methods that he does not personally have to go through security checks — the inspiration, perhaps, behind Huckabee’s challenge.

Click here to read more.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Obama: N. Korea is ‘Serious’ Threat

barack obama22 Obama: N. Korea is Serious ThreatABC News reports:

President Obama today strongly condemned North Korea’s attack on South Korea and, in an exclusive interview with ABC News’ Barbara Walters, urged China to take a stand against aggression.

“This is a — just one more provocative incident in a series that we’ve seen over the last several months, and I’m going to be talking to the president of Korea — South Korea this evening and we’ll be consulting closely with them in terms of the appropriate response,” the president said. “We’ve strongly condemned the attack…We are rallying the international community once again to put pressure on North Korea.”

Obama wouldn’t speculate on military actions the U.S. may take, but reiterated that South Korea is “one of our most important allies” and “a cornerstone of U.S. security in the Pacific region.”

“We want to make sure all the parties in the region recognize that this is a serious and ongoing threat that has to be dealt with,” the president added.

He specifically called on China to stand firm and “make clear to North Korean that there are a set of international rules that they need to abide by.”

A White House official today told ABC’s Jake Tapper that the United States is discussing a number of measures with its allies, including action at the United Nations Security Council and further sanctions, and more joint U.S.-South Korea military exercises, to demonstrate solidarity and support.

Click here to read more.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

FF Symposium: What We’re Most Thankful For

To celebrate Thanksgiving, FrumForum asked our contributors to share what they are most thankful for politically this year. Former Bush administration appointee Zac Morgan is thankful that 2010 saw the tea party’s worst candidates smacked down by voters.? Shawn Summers is grateful the GOP’s “party of no” phase may finally be over.? Blogger John Guardiano looks overseas and is thankful to find Obama recommitted to winning the war in Afghanistan.? Two contributors looked at the bigger picture: Heartland Institute’s Eli Lehrer is thankful for divided government while Fox Business News analyst Brad Schaeffer is grateful for our electoral system.? Joe Marier is just relieved the midterms are finally over, while FF contributor and Johns Hopkins student Rachel Ryan is (sort of) thankful for the Dems’ health reform bill…

This year, I’m politically thankful for a return to divided government. I’m not expecting a reign of Republican sunshine and light (although, of course, as The Simpsons teach, Republicans live in haunted castles anyway) but I’m looking forward to a Congress that, after lots of nastiness, actually manages to pass some incremental legislation to move the country in the right direction.? (Fixes to Obamacare and spending cuts should top the list.) One party control under either party often results in big new programs intended to buy votes. Divided government with a Democratic President and Republican Congress, has actually tended to shrink government. Republicans are given to busting the defense budget and Democrats to upping domestic spending in every category.?? With one party controlling the executive and the other the legislature, overall spending restraint becomes a lot more feasible.

Even though my single-most favored candidate—outgoing Florida CFO Alex Sink, the only Democrat I’ve supported as a grownup—lost in a very narrow election for governor of Florida, I’m very pleased with the outcome of the election. Sink’s victory could have moved the Democratic Party in a decidedly pro-market direction; but it was not to be. And that may be just as well; both parties can’t really be just the same.? The defeats of Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle give a stern warning to members of the Republican Party who put conservative lip service above ability.

On balance, I’m feeling good about the Republican Party and conservative movement. Sure, Republican voters have elected a few crazies, haters, and others unqualified to be in Congress. (But that happens in every “wave” election.) Once the adrenalin of the campaign trail fades and party leadership safely locks away whichever members of the current class turn out to be the most insane,? Republicans will be able to get down to the bargaining table and drive the necessary hard bargains with President Obama. It isn’t going to be pretty. But it will sure be interesting and, I believe, good for the country.

- Eli Lehrer is a Senior Fellow and National Director for the Heartland Institute

*? *? *

While I unfortunately didn’t get my election wish – Pat Toomey held on to his crumbling lead and managed to win the Pennsylvania Senate election with 51.6% of the vote – I am still nevertheless thankful for the outcome of this election season. Not merely that many Republicans won their races, but that (mostly) the right sort of Republicans did. Both Sharron Angle and Christine O’Donnell, neither of whom should have won an election for dogcatcher, let alone senator, went down in ignominious defeat.

I am hopeful that Speaker Boehner (a sure improvement over Speaker Pelosi) will rein in some of the bad instincts of Tea Party-affiliated freshmen and negotiate a positive agenda in good faith with the Democrats in the Senate and White House. Similarly, I’m grateful that the 2010 election must mark the end of the GOP’s post-2008 “party of (hell) no” phase. Though a cynical Republican leadership could use the GOP hold on the House and not the Senate as an excuse to throw up endless accountability-free obstruction, no one should be taken in if a GOP-controlled House digs in its heels and tries to blame Democrats for grinding down the wheels of government. Voters have given the Republican Party a temporary and easily revoked second chance, and will expect results. If they don’t get them, 2012 will arrive uncomfortably soon for the newly empowered GOP.

- Shawn F. Summers is an editorial assistant at FrumForum and an undergraduate at Georgetown University

*? *? *

Whatever you think about the Democrats’ health reform bill, as a soon-to-be college graduate still hoping to bag a job, I’m politically thankful for being able to freeload off of my parents’ health insurance for the next five years!

- Rachel Ryan is a reporter for FrumForum and a student of political science at Johns Hopkins University

*? *? *

I’m thankful for two things:

First, that Californians said no sale to the rearview-mirror energy bromides peddled by the proponents of Proposition 23, which would have killed the state’s law capping greenhouse gas emissions and dried up the inflow of capital for building up the state’s cleantech industries. Two of the heroes of the successful campaign to squash Prop. 23 were a fired-up Arnold Schwarzenegger, who went on a rhetorical tear against fossil fuel interests in order to protect his legacy, and George Shultz, President Reagan’s secretary of state, who harkened back to the Gipper’s confidence in the power of American innovation to fix big problems.

Also, I’m thankful Lisa Murkowski plowed Joe Miller under in a come-from-behind write-in victory. That feat should earn Lisa an asterisk in the history books that will make for a fun trivia contest answer a century from now. More importantly for those of us alive today, Murkowski blocked the Senate door to Miller, the gaffe-prone, thin-skinned fount of goofball notions who had no business sitting in what is still – for all its institutional dysfunction of late – the world’s greatest deliberative body. And the delicious dessert of this Thanksgiving feast is that Lisa smoked an acolyte of Sarah Palin in the Quitter’s backyard.

- Jim DiPeso is Vice-President for Communications of Republicans for Environmental Protection

*? *? *

I’m thankful the GOP managed to elect Mark Kirk in Illinois and I still hold out hope that he and Susan Collins can form a true GOP “Mod Squad” in the Senate. I have also been encouraged to see that Scott Brown is making news again by?cooperating?with Sen. Ron Wyden on a possible fix to the individual mandate. We all of course know what happened to the last GOP Senator who tried to work across the aisle with Wyden, but I commend the serious approach to policy being shown.

I am also thankful to see that Sharron Angle crashed and burned in Nevada because she ran a terrible campaign. (As Politico explained in this?post-mortem). While it is a shame that Harry Reid will return to the Senate, it’s reassuring to know that in some cases, truly terrible candidates failed in their efforts to be elected, even in an anti-incumbency wave election.

- Noah Kristula-Green is an editor at FrumForum

*? *? *

What I am thankful for is that the integrity of the American electoral system, warts and all, once again showed its resilience on November 2.? Not because of the results of the elections per se, although I do think we took a step in the right direction after a frightening dalliance with already historically failed systems/theories.? Rather, I?am in awe of my country?because the long tradition of peaceful transfer of power that has sustained us since Washington willingly resigned his commission to Congress in Annapolis in 1783 was upheld yet again.

Such changes in the guard sans bloodshed and mayhem we take for granted… but the long violent history of mankind shows that we are the exception, not the rule.? It is an amazing act of solidarity that a nation so large, so diverse, so powerful has maintained this Enlightenment era tradition—even as the world at large often burned around us.

So I am thankful for the Framers who in their wisdom designed a system that though imperfect still works over two centuries later.? And I am thankful for the American people who have in the end, despite our squabbling and sometimes confrontational overtones, despite fringe groups on both sides who distort the national debate, maintained faith in the?process that places the ballot box over the cartridge box and once again accepted the verdict of the electorate as the final authority — grudgingly for many, but ultimately and unequivocally for the good of all.

- Brad Schaeffer is co-founder and CEO of INFA Energy Brokers, LLC and an energy analyst to Fox Business News

*? *? *

For reform-minded conservatives such as myself, it’s easy to get despondent, because there’s always so much that has to be done, but which isn’t getting done because of entrenched, bureaucratic interests.

So it is important to give thanks at least once a year for what has been achieved: because we conservatives do have a lot to be thankful for. Herewith, then, is my list:

(1)? President Obama’s Cautious and Deliberative Nature. Yes, Obama’s a liberal Democrat who campaigned as an anti-war candidate. But Obama also is an extremely cautious and careful man not prone to reckless and rash decision-making. Thus he has wisely refrained from closing Guantanamo Bay and, more importantly, refrained from abruptly withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.

In fact, Obama has significantly increased the number of troops in Afghanistan and, to everyone’s surprise, seems committed to winning the war there. Indeed, American troops, he declared last week in Lisbon, Portugal, will remain in Iraq and Afghanistan for many years to come in order to conduct counterterrorism operations.

For his cautious and deliberative nature, and for wisely heeding the advice and counsel of his military advisers — especially Generals Petraeus and McChrystal re Iraq and Afghanistan — all Americans should give thanks and praise this holiday season. We are all safer and more secure as a result.

(2)? The Republican House of Representatives. Two years ago the political cognoscenti were discounting the Republican Party as a spent political force with no real future. Yet, 62 House seats later, the GOP has scored the biggest Congressional gain in 62 years.

Sure, the Republicans still have myriad problems to overcome. But their stunning victory has reshaped the political landscape and put the far left on the defensive.

That in itself is a major achievement and something for which all Americans should be thankful: Because without their House majority, the Left won’t be able to initiate and push destructive legislative proposals such as “comprehensive national health insurance.” For at least the next two years, then, the far left will be left out. Hallelujah!

(3)? Supreme Court Justices Antonia Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts and Samuel Alito. The state and federal judiciary are major political battlegrounds, unfortunately, and ones which ought to worry all conservatives. Left-wing judges and left-wing justices, after all, are bound and determined to usurp the political prerogatives of the people and their elected representatives.

They first must contend, however, with four of the most intellectually formidable Supreme Court justices ever to grace the high court.

Justice Scalia is the supreme and unrivaled leader of the Constitutionalists and an intellectual force of nature unto himself. And although Scalia and the Constitutionalists lose a disconcerting number of cases by an excruciating 5-4 margin, they nonetheless have had, and continue to have, a profound effect on the court’s jurisprudence — as well as a profound effect on the political and legal dialogue in America. And for that we can and should give thanks.

- John Guardiano served as a Marine in Iraq and once worked on the Army’s Future Combat Systems (FCS) modernization program. He blogs at www.ResoluteCon.com (www.twitter.com/JohnRGuardiano)

*? *? *

While 2012 remains a bit of a mash-up, as a young conservative I am thankful that the Republican bench looks to be coalescing around a promising crop of figures who could significantly emerge for 2016.

While 2010 was surely the year of the Tea Party, for better or worse the tectonic shifts in the Party have planted seeds for a very promising new generation of Republican office holders. The shining star is Marco Rubio, but Kelly Ayotte, Susana Martinez, Scott Brown, Brian Sandoval and the continuing emergence of Paul Ryan can all go a long way toward re-establishing the Party as the big tent in American politics. I’m thankful that 2010’s conservative chaos yielded what may ultimately turn out to be positive long-term results.

- Corey Chambliss is a government research analyst in New York

*? *? *

Rand Paul’s victory in the Senate race in Kentucky fulfilled my unenthusiastic pre-election wish, which was driven by aversion to Paul’s opponent, the guy with the Aqua Buddha commercial.

One thing I’m thankful for politically is that the Intelligent Design movement remains politically moribund, five years after the landmark Kitzmiller decision ruled ID a form of creationism that has no place in public-school science classes. Yes, there are still skirmishes at textbook boards and local school boards as creationists try to insert anti-evolutionism under the guise of “academic freedom” without offering a theologically based alternative. Overall, though, public-school science classes have been confirmed as places where science is taught.

And yes, the abovementioned Rand Paul declined to comment on the age of the Earth during the election campaign. Fortunately, it’s a topic Sen. Paul doesn’t need to know much about.

- Kenneth Silber is a senior editor at?Research, a magazine for financial advisors, and blogs at Quicksilber

*? *? *

I am thankful for the chastisement of the Tea Party movement by the voters of Colorado, Nevada, and Delaware. ?Those races illustrated that even in the most desperate of times, in the biggest Republican wave in at least half a century (and at all levels: federal, state, local), candidates who promote “Evil U.N.” conspiracy theories or think citizens may soon need to consider “Second Amendment remedies” will not be accepted.

Granted, we need to see if that temperance holds. ?Another two years of economic near-depression could lower the threshold for pulling the lever for less stable candidates. ?For now, a message was sent on election day: Yes, we don’t like the President’s policies, but we also want people who are serious about governing. ?This is a good message. ?As a bonus, the obliteration of the Angle and O’Donnell campaigns was a rebuke to the Jim DeMints of the world: it exposed the message of ideological purity as a recipe for permanent minority.

While I would have preferred the Republicans to win, this message of “Be serious!”, if the party listens, will help us build a lasting conservative majority.

Sadly, my midterm wish (the defeat of Jim Moran) did not happen, and given the economic conditions of Virginia’s 8th (pretty damn good), had no real chance. ?Maybe someday!

- Zac Morgan is a former Bush Administration political appointee and is currently attending George Mason University School of Law

*? *? *

I am thankful that the Republicans outperformed my expectations in the House.

I am thankful that the voters of the North Carolina 2nd Congressional District deigned to honor the only (tiny) donation I made this year, and elected Renee Ellmers as their new congresswoman.

I am thankful that we were all disappointed that we didn’t gain 9 Senate seats.

And finally, I am thankful that the 2010 midterms are over. Except for those recounts…

- T. Joseph Marier blogs at Going Noble.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here